POLITICS ELECTIONS AND ELECTION CAMPAIGNS: CANDIDATES :
UNITED STATES: POLITICS: POLITICAL PARTIES: REPUBLICAN PARTY, TEA PARTY :
INDUSTRIES: PETROLEUM :
HATE GROUPS :
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES: NAMED PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES: DONALD TRUMP :
BLATANT FALSEHOODS :
SERIAL LIARS :
REPUBLICAN WAR ON WOMEN :
RAPE CULTURE :
CRIME AND CRIMINALS: SEXUAL PREDATORS :
TRUMP AND REPUBLICAN VOTER FRAUD, GERRYMANDERING AND INTIMIDATION:
A court has gotten the Trump campaign on the record promising not to intimidate voters on Election Day. That is huge.
By Richard L. Hasen
A shorter URL for the above link:
On Friday morning, a federal district court will hear arguments in a dispute between the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee over whether the RNC, the Trump campaign, and its allies are violating a long-standing consent decree barring the RNC from engaging in intimidation of minority voters at the polls. Its not the only case being heard on an emergency basis this week: Democrats have filed suit against Donald Trump, Republican state parties, and Trump ally Roger Stone in the battleground states of Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. In the Nevada suit, Stone has been ordered to explain at a separate Friday hearing what his questionable Stop the Steal organization is planning for Election Day.
But regardless of how these hearings go Friday, the lawsuits have already borne fruit by getting the campaign on the record with its plans and promises not to intimidate voters. In an important development on Thursday afternoon, the Trump campaign in response to the lawsuits sent an email to Nevada campaign workers describing for them what constitutes illegal harassment and what constitutes good behavior. By getting Trump on the record promising not to harass voters with its ballot security activities, the Democrats have significantly lessened the chances of Trump-driven voter intimidation on Election Day.
Democrats have presented evidence of the Trump campaigns encouragement of intimidation.
The main suit stems from RNC activities targeted at minority voters going back to the 1980s ostensibly to stop voter fraud but really about keeping down the Democratic vote. At the time, the Republican Party was accused of sending off-duty police officers to patrol voting precincts in minority areas, it used vote caging to send mail to remove minority voter from the rolls (something that was still happening this week in North Carolina), and it engaged in enough other illicit activities that the RNC settled the case through a consent decree that makes the organization liable for contempt if it violates it. The decree was extended in the past decade over RNC objectionswhich went all the way to the Supreme Courtand expires next year unless the Democrats show that the RNC or its agents are still violating it.
Democrats have presented evidence of the Trump campaigns encouragement of intimidation, specifically its beating of the voter fraud drum and the candidates words instructing his supporters, after they vote, to go to certain areas to look for such fraud (certain areas being code for majority black neighborhoods in Philadelphia and other cities). Theres a good argument that the close working relationship between Trump and the RNC makes them agents of each other, and thus that any forbidden Trump activities would mean a violation of the consent decree by the RNC. Democrats have also presented evidence of poll-watchers who said they are from the RNC, a claim that the RNC denies. (Among other things, the RNC says some of these people were working for a consultant hired by the RNC but not to do this particular kind of work.) On Wednesday, the RNC issued its response to a court order questioning its involvement in voter suppression efforts by basically having statements retracted from Trump running mate Mike Pence and campaign manger Kellyanne Conway that had suggested that the campaign and the RNC were working together to prevent voter fraud.
While it is true that we cannot discount the problem of Trump vigilantes, the suit has forced the RNC, state parties, and the Trump campaign to disclose their official plans. In the Nevada suit, for example, the morning after the court held an emergency hearing, the Trump campaign sent out an email to all those supporters who signed up to be poll-watchers in Nevada that carefully limits the circumstances in which they can try to challenge voters. All over the materials are calls for Trump supporters to avoid anything that looks like voter intimidation.
Its no surprise then that Marc Elias, the Democratic Partys superlawyer who has been leading this amazing flurry of voting rights lawsuits, tweeted that the letter directing Nevada Trump supporters not to challenge voters without getting legal advice first was the first success from the lawsuit.
The complete article may be read at the URL above.
Temple University and Google Sites Research Guides
AND Discussion Group Directory
RESEARCH PAPER WRITING
DISABILITIES AND EMPLOYMENT
PUBLIC HEALTH RESOURCES INCLUDING EBOLA
STATISTICS SOURCES RESEARCH GUIDE
Social Work and Social Issues Discussion Group
Tourism Discussion Group
Digital Scholarship Discussion Group
Articles by David Dillard
Information Literacy (Russell Conwell Guide)
Nina Dillard’s Photographs on Net-Gold
Temple University Site Map
Bushell, R. & Sheldon, P. (eds),
Wellness and Tourism: Mind, Body, Spirit,
Place, New York: Cognizant Communication Books.
Wellness Tourism: Bibliographic and Webliographic Essay
David P. Dillard
Improve Your Chances for Indoor Gardening Success
HEALTH DIET FITNESS RECREATION SPORTS TOURISM
Please Ignore All Links to JIGLU
in search results for Net-Gold and related lists.
The Net-Gold relationship with JIGLU has
been terminated by JIGLU and these are dead links.
Temple University Listserv Alert :
Years 2009 and 2010 Eliminated from Archives
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#5053):
View All Messages In Topic (1):