POLITICS ELECTIONS AND ELECTION CAMPAIGNS: CANDIDATES :
UNITED STATES: POLITICS: POLITICAL PARTIES: REPUBLICAN PARTY, TEA PARTY :
INDUSTRIES: PETROLEUM :
HATE GROUPS :
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES: NAMED PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES: DONALD TRUMP :
BLATANT FALSEHOODS :
SERIAL LIARS :
REPUBLICAN WAR ON WOMEN :
How Vladimir Putin Won the U.S. Election
How Vladimir Putin Won the U.S. Election
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton
gave the Russian president precisely what he needed.
By Paul D. Shinkman
November 9, 2016, at 2:39 a.m.
A shorter URL for the above link:
No matter the results on Tuesday, one outcome was always secured: Russian President Vladimir Putin has used the U.S. election to bolster his standing at home and increase his relevance overseas.
Whether through a well-timed public comment, a military deployment that exposed weaknesses in America’s own war plans, or reportedly actual meddling in the U.S. electoral process, Putin has ensured that he got what he wanted out of this year’s presidential race. In Donald Trump’s victory, Putin has an American counterpart who has publicly stated he will adopt a more amenable policy toward Russia, getting out of its way in Syria and perhaps even overseeing lifting international sanctions. If Hillary Clinton had won, Putin still would have emerged as the perfect foil for any American president who sees Russia as an adversary, further hardening a view among the Russian people that NATO is once again attempting to surround its former Cold War foe and that they need a strong leader to protect them.
Putin’s name came up frequently during the campaign, including amid reporting on Trump’s business ambitions in Russia and his former campaign manager’s ties to powerful figures in Moscow and Ukraine. The Republican nominee held up the Russian president for his strength of leadership, favorably comparing him with President Barack Obama in that regard. For Hillary Clinton, he loomed as the bogeyman at the center of a conspiracy to undermine her chances of moving from chief diplomat to commander in chief.
Throughout the campaign, Putin found a way to benefit from these perceptions and turn them into opportunities to reinforce his authority.
“It’s the small opportunism that he knows how to target in a tactical, brilliant way,” says Nina Khrushcheva, a specialist on Russian propaganda and professor at New York’s New School University.
Very likely, the winner of the election was comparatively of little consequence to Putin, analysts suggest. More importantly, the Russian leader saw an opportunity to exploit what he sees as hypocrisy and unfairness in the American electoral process to counter Western criticism that he has manipulated votes in Russia to maintain his hold on power.
“An adversarial relationship suits Putin just fine,” says Khrushcheva, the granddaughter of Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev. “He needs to stay in power, and what better form to stay in power than America breathing down your neck and wants to take you down? It’s a really good argument which, of course, America fed into.”
Many experts doubt Putin personally ordered the hacking of the Democratic National Committee, releasing thousands of emails from party leaders and granting fodder to those who believe Democrats orchestrated Bernie Sanders’ defeat in the primary process. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper consistently refrained from ever flat-out accusing the Russian government itself, indicating the hackers had unspecific ties to Moscow even though the leaks were “consistent with methods and motivations of Russian directed efforts.”
Regardless of who was behind it, the ploy served Putin’s purposes. Clinton and her backers, embarrassed by a steady drip of unflattering revelations, focused their response on blaming Moscow.
“This image of him plotting and scheming and keen to influence the outcome is imaginary, a product of the Washington-campaign echo chamber,” says Robert English, a specialist on Russian nationalism at the University of Southern California. “Putin is right about one thing: The Clinton and Obama people are overreacting to the hack and painting it as a nefarious Russian plot to subvert our democracy precisely because it diverts attention from the dirty linen that the hack reveals and turns it instead to Trump’s strange bromance with Putin.
“Putin can only be laughing at how much apparent influence he has.”
The complete article may be read at the URL above.
Temple University and Google Sites Research Guides
AND Discussion Group Directory
RESEARCH PAPER WRITING
DISABILITIES AND EMPLOYMENT
PUBLIC HEALTH RESOURCES INCLUDING EBOLA
STATISTICS SOURCES RESEARCH GUIDE
Social Work and Social Issues Discussion Group
Tourism Discussion Group
Digital Scholarship Discussion Group
Articles by David Dillard
Information Literacy (Russell Conwell Guide)
Nina Dillard’s Photographs on Net-Gold
Temple University Site Map
Bushell, R. & Sheldon, P. (eds),
Wellness and Tourism: Mind, Body, Spirit,
Place, New York: Cognizant Communication Books.
Wellness Tourism: Bibliographic and Webliographic Essay
David P. Dillard
Improve Your Chances for Indoor Gardening Success
HEALTH DIET FITNESS RECREATION SPORTS TOURISM
Please Ignore All Links to JIGLU
in search results for Net-Gold and related lists.
The Net-Gold relationship with JIGLU has
been terminated by JIGLU and these are dead links.
Temple University Listserv Alert :
Years 2009 and 2010 Eliminated from Archives
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#2621):
View All Messages In Topic (1):